Im gonna go ahead and respond 1 last time to you, feel special.
Ive driven 2 350's and kept one for overnight at one point. Also kept a G35 for a couple days aswell back when I was car shopping.
Yes I have driven one kthnx
Still wrong, yes TT is faster and more desireable but doesnt make the NA "not worth alot"
For example lets use...... a 68 Mustang
Ok 68 Mustang had a version that came with a 289 engine. Also there was a version that had a 351 which was faster and much more desired. According to your ramblings the less desired car being a 68 Stang with a 289 wouldnt be worth a whole lot..........
WOW GREAT THINKIN! And dont tell me to learn to read when the problem is obviously someone elses lack of ability to expess themselves clearly in writing.
Quote
"NA was superior to everything when it came out? who gives a fuck? it came out 14 years ago...what is it superior to now? not a damn thing!" reply
First cursing does nothing but show your lack of ability to talk about a disagreement in an adult manner and anger. Its ok many people have many different opinions get over it and learn some social skills. I CARE that it was way more superior then most other cars. Im proud of the Z's heritage arent you?
I have a clue that the 350 is better in these departments, gawd knows with 14 years more design under its belt it better be. NA came before the TT and was far more advanced then most cars over the road 350 isnt deal with it.
Doesnt mean it isnt still a nice car. Im gonna go ahead and put up a reply to your next rumblings since I wont be returning to read em.
Please incase I missed em at some point repost more pics of your Z. Would love to see pics of your whole car and engine. I can appretiate anyone whos put that much work into their Z.
 91 Cherry Pearl 2+2
03 Acura 3.2 TL TYPE S |
19:42:00 12/14/03
way to ASSume - 
